Wood can solve SA’s housing problem

By | 2020-10-13T11:51:47+00:00 October 13th, 2020|

This article was first published in the Business Insider

South Africa has enough log resource options available to build close to 95 000 houses a year, according to researchers at Stellenbosch University (SU) who studied the potential for such a housing solution.

Timber homes in South Africa are still the exception rather than the rule. Image credit: Solid wood homes

Timber homes in South Africa are still the exception rather than the rule. Image credit: Solid wood homes

According to Philip Crafford from the Stellenbosch University’s Department of Forest and Wood Science, South Africa could have log resources of 6.23 million cubic metres available for wood house components in the future. “That is excluding imports and current pulp, board and other log resources,” says Crafford.

Despite the abundance of resources, only about 1% of new houses in the country are wood-based, compared to more than 90% in countries such as the USA, Canada, and Australia.

The study showed that with the use of wood resources currently exported as chips, as well as planting trees in areas that have been earmarked for afforestation, it will be possible (in the long term) to sustain a future residential building market where all houses are built with wood,” says Crafford.

Crafford and colleague Brand Wessels investigated the country’s log resources and the potential global warming impact of an increasing wood-based residential building market. The findings of their study were published in the South African Journal of Science recently.

The duo wanted to determine whether local forest resources would be able to supply the required wood for substantial growth in wood-based residential development in South Africa. They analysed the residential housing footprint in the country; available log resources for wood-based buildings; and the likely environmental impacts of such a building system.

“Due to the limited forest cover in South Africa, the perception is often that significant increases in the market share of wood-based buildings are not possible (at least from local wood resources). Our study showed that this perception is not correct.

“If we consider only current available wood chips as a resource, 39 646 wood-based houses (30 523 houses and 9 123 flats) could be built annually. With the afforestation resources, 55 314 houses (42 586 houses and 12 728 flats) could be constructed each year. That is 1 203 more than the average new buildings in the past 17 years.

“Considering both wood chips and afforestation resource potential, close to 95 000 wood-based houses (172% of current supply) could be built annually,” he says.

Crafford adds that South Africa’s industrial round wood (saw logs for everyday use) production is mainly used to make pulp and board products (51%), sawn lumber (24%), and chip exports for Asia.

“Over the past 10 years, we exported an average of 3.5 million tons of wood chips annually. Chip exports is the most likely available resource which could potentially be used in the building of wood-based houses.”

Regarding the environmental impact, Crafford says numerous studies have shown that timber is not only renewable, but is also the best performer across most environmental impact factors when compared to alternative building material such as steel and concrete, with particularly good performance in terms of greenhouse gas emissions.

“Our basic modelling analyses shows that if 20% of new houses were to be built with wood, the amount of energy/fossil fuels required for production and the global warming potential of the residential building sector could decrease by 4.9%. If all new constructions were wood based, this could decrease by up to 30%.

Source: Business Insider